Directrices de presentación de informes para intervenciones basadas en la música: un estudio de actualización y validación

Sheri L. Robb; Stacey Springs; Emmeline Edwars; Tasha L. Golden; Julene K. Johnson; Debra S. Burns; Melita Belgrave; Joke Bradt; Christian Gold; Assal Habibi; John R. Iversen; Miriam Lense; Jessica A. MacLean; Susan M. Perkins

doi:10.59028/misostenido.2025.08

Autores/as

Sheri L. Robb Indiana University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-0934
Stacey Springs Harvard University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3991-8890
Emmeline Edwars National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Tasha L. Golden Florida University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-4967
Julene K. Johnson University of California
Debra S. Burns University of Memphis https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-5446
Melita Belgrave Arizona State University
Joke Bradt Drexel University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-9829
Christian Gold University of Bergan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8654-7474
Assal Habibi University of Southern California https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1420-3568
John R. Iversen McMaster University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-9848
Miriam Lense Vanderbilt University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-3032
Jessica A. MacLean Indiana University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5468-5875
Susan M. Perkins Indiana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59028/misostenido.2025.08

Palabras clave:

pautas de presentación de informes, musica, musicoterapia, intervención, calidad de los informes

Resumen

Antecedentes: La elaboración de informes detallados de las intervenciones es esencial para la interpretación, replicación y traducción de las intervenciones musicales (MBI). Las Directrices de Informes para Intervenciones Musicales de 2011 se desarrollaron para mejorar la transparencia y la calidad de los informes de las investigaciones publicadas; sin embargo, persisten problemas con la calidad de los informes. Esto representa un obstáculo importante para los avances en la investigación científica de las MBI y la aplicación práctica de los hallazgos. Objetivo: Actualizar y validar las directrices de presentación de informes de 2011 utilizando un riguroso enfoque Delphi que involucró a un grupo interdisciplinario de investigadores del MBI; y desarrollar una declaración de guía de explicación y elaboración para apoyar la difusión y el uso. Métodos: Seguimos el marco metodológico para el desarrollo de las directrices de reporte recomendadas por la Red EQUATOR y las recomendaciones para el desarrollo de directrices de reporte de investigación en salud. Nuestro proceso de tres etapas incluyó: (1) un análisis de campo inicial, (2) un proceso de consenso mediante encuestas Delphi (dos rondas) y reuniones de un panel de expertos, y (3) la elaboración y difusión de un documento explicativo y de desarrollo. Resultados: Los hallazgos de la primera ronda de la encuesta revelaron que los ítems originales de la lista de verificación capturaban contenido que los investigadores consideraban esencial para los informes de MBI; sin embargo, también se detectaron problemas con la redacción y la terminología de los ítems. Las reuniones posteriores del Panel de Expertos y la segunda ronda de la encuesta se centraron en alcanzar un consenso sobre la redacción de los ítems. La lista de verificación revisada de RG-MBI consta de 12 ítems que corresponden a ocho componentes diferentes de las intervenciones de MBI, incluyendo nombre, fundamento teórico/científico, contenido, intervencionista, individuo/grupo, entorno, cronograma de administración y fidelidad al tratamiento. Conclusión: Recomendamos que los autores, editores de revistas y revisores utilicen las pautas RG-MBI, junto con las pautas basadas en métodos (por ejemplo, CONSORT) para acelerar y mejorar el rigor científico de la investigación de MBI.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Altman, D. G. (1994). The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ, 308, 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283

Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Ravaud, P. (2008a). Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration (for the CONSORT Group). Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 295–309. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008

Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Ravaud, P. (2008b). Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments (for the CONSORT Group). Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, W60–W66. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008-w1

Bradt, J., Dileo, C., Myers-Coffman, K., & Biondo, J. (2021). Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022, CD006911. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4

Chen, W. G., Iversen, J. R., Kao, M. H., Loui, P., Patel, A. D., Zatorre, R. J., et al. (2022). Music and brain circuitry: Strategies for strengthening evidence-based research for music-based interventions. Journal of Neuroscience, 42, 8498–8507. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1135-22.2022

de Witte, M., Pinho, A. D. S., Stams, G. J., Moonen, X., Bos, A. E. R., & van Hooren, S. (2022). Music therapy for stress reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 16, 134–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1846580

de Witte, M., Spruit, A., van Hooren, S., Moonen, X., & Stams, G. J. (2020). Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: A systematic review and two meta-analyses. Health Psychology Review, 14, 294–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1627897

Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., & Crepaz, N. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement (for the TREND Group). American Journal of Public Health, 94, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.3.361

Dijkers, M., Kropp, G. C., Esper, R. M., Yavuzer, G., Cullen, N., & Bakdalieh, Y. (2002). Quality of intervention research reporting in medical rehabilitation journals. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81, 21–33. https://journals.lww.com/ajpmr/abstract/2002/01000/quality_of_intervention_research_reporting_in.5.aspx

Duzgun, M. V., & Ozer, Z. (2020). The effects of music intervention on breast milk production in breastfeeding mothers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76, 3307–3316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14589

Edwards, E., St Hillaire-Clarke, C., Frankowski, D. W., Finkelstein, R., Cheever, T., Chen, W. G., et al. (2023). NIH music-based intervention toolkit: Music-based interventions for brain disorders of aging. Neurology, 100, 868–878. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000206797

EQUATOR Network. (2023). Updating the reporting guidelines for music-based interventions (registered 9 January 2023) [Online]. EQUATOR Network. Retrieved June 16, 2024, from https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-other-study-designs/#MUSIC

EQUATOR Network. (2024a). Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research: What is a reporting guideline? [Online]. EQUATOR Network. Retrieved June 16, 2024, from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/

EQUATOR Network. (2024b). Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research: About us [Online]. EQUATOR Network. Retrieved June 16, 2024, from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/

EQUATOR Network. (2024c). How to develop a reporting guideline [Online]. EQUATOR Network. Retrieved June 16, 2024, from https://www.equator-network.org/toolkits/developing-a-reporting-guideline/

Gao, Y., Wei, Y., Yang, W., Jiang, L., Li, X., Ding, J., et al. (2019). The effectiveness of music therapy for terminally ill patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 57, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.504

Golden, T. L., Springs, S., Kimmel, H. J., Gupta, S., Tiedemann, A., Sandu, C. C., et al. (2021). The use of music in the treatment and management of serious mental illness: A global scoping review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 649840. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649840

Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., et al. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687

Jespersen, K. V., Pando-Naude, V., Koenig, J., Jennum, P., & Vuust, P. (2022). Listening to music for insomnia in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022, CD010459. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010459.pub3

Matthews, R. C., & Rothwell, P. (2018). Douglas G Altman: Statistician, researcher, and driving force behind global initiatives to improve the reliability of research. BMJ, 361, k2588. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2588

Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLOS Medicine, 7, e1000217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217

Monsalve-Duarte, S., Betancourt-Zapata, W., Suarez-Canon, N., Maya, R., Salgado-Vasco, A., Prieto-Garces, S., et al. (2022). Music therapy and music medicine interventions with adult burn patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns, 48, 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.11.002

Moreno-Morales, C., Calero, R., Moreno-Morales, P., & Pintado, C. (2020). Music therapy in the treatment of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine, 7, 160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00160

Nguyen, K. T., Xiao, J., Chan, D. N. S., Zhang, M., & Chan, C. W. H. (2022). Effects of music intervention on anxiety, depression, and quality of life of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 30, 5615–5626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06881-2

Perera, R., Heneghan, C., & Yudkin, P. (2007). Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions. BMJ, 334, 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39045.396817.68

Pocock, S. J., Hughes, M. D., & Lee, R. J. (1987). Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials: A survey of three medical journals. New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198708133170706

Robb, S. L., Burns, D. S., & Carpenter, J. S. (2011). Reporting guidelines for music-based interventions. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105310374781

Robb, S. L., & Carpenter, J. S. (2009). A review of music-based intervention reporting in pediatrics. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309103568

Robb, S. L., Hanson-Abromeit, D., May, L., Hernandez-Ruiz, E., Allison, M., Beloat, A., et al. (2018). Reporting quality of music intervention research in healthcare: A systematic review. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 38, 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2018.02.008

Robb, S. L., Story, M., Harman, E., Burns, D., Bradt, J., Edwards, E., et al. (2025). Reporting Guidelines for Music-based Interventions Checklist: Explanation and elaboration guide. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1552659. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1552659

Sauerbrei, W., Bland, M., Evans, S. J. W., Riley, R. D., Royston, P., Schumacher, M., et al. (2021). Doug Altman: Driving critical appraisal and improvements in the quality of methodological and medical research. Biometrical Journal, 63, 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202000053

Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, 1, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.72352

Sinha, I. P., Smyth, R. L., & Williamson, P. R. (2011). Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: Recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLOS Medicine, 8, e1000393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393

Wang, C., Li, G., Zheng, L., Meng, X., Meng, Q., Wang, S., et al. (2021). Effects of music intervention on sleep quality of older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 59, 102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102719

Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Fan, Y., Tan, X. S., & Lei, X. (2018). Effects of music intervention on the physical and mental status of patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Care, 13, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487073

Yang, T., Wang, S., Wang, R., Wei, Y., Kang, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). Effectiveness of five-element music therapy in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 44, 101416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101416

Yangoz, S. T., & Ozer, Z. (2019). The effect of music intervention on patients with cancer-related pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75, 3362–3373. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14184

Yangoz, S. T., & Ozer, Z. (2022). Effects of music intervention on physical and psychological problems in adults receiving haemodialysis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31, 3305–3326. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16199