Innovative learning spaces for the university of the future. Bibliometric review (2011-2024)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9781/rep.2025.388

Keywords:

Innovative physical spaces, virtual learning environments, educational technology, classroom of the future, higher education, educational trends

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increase in innovative learning spaces in the educational context becoming one of the main national and international trends. This study aims to analyse the scientific production on the influence of these spaces in the university teaching and learning process between 2011 and 2024. A bibliometric and systematic review has been carried out following the PRISMA guidelines, identifying 56 articles indexed in Web of Science with a high concordance index (k = 0.97). Descriptive analysis and co-citation cluster analysis of references, sources and authors were carried out. The results show an exponential growth of studies focused on these spaces, mainly in Spain. They also reveal a clear structure in four thematic blocks: (a) theoretical foundations, (b) impact, (c) pedagogical innovations and educational technologies, and (d) social context. Where appropriate, the sources are organised into four clusters on (a) teaching and learning in higher education, (b) technology in education, (c) pedagogical innovation and (d) health sciences education. The network of author co-citations reveals four main clusters: (a) innovative approaches, (b) educational technology, (c) intercultural approach and (d) experiential learning. It is concluded that innovative learning spaces are a fundamental, influencing the development of health sciences education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eva Jiménez-García, Universidad Europea

Accredited Doctor of Education with an Extraordinary Doctorate Award (2016) and a Bachelor’s Degree in Pedagogy from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. She currently works as head of research and head of the Educational Research Centre (CIE-UE) in the Faculty of Education at the Universidad Europea de Madrid. Associate Professor in Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education (ANECA). Her research interests focus on the measurement and evaluation of educational systems. She is a member of the Medida y Evaluación de Sistemas Educativos (MESE) research group at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Member of the Advisory Committee of the journal Tendencias Pedagógicas and member of the Assessment Committees of two impact journals.

Judit Ruíz-Lázaro, National University of Distance Education

Doctor of Education from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (2021) with an International Doctorate mention, Doctorate awarded with the grade of Outstanding Cum Laude, and Extraordinary Doctorate Award. Accredited as Associate Professor by ANECA (2024). She has an ongoing recognised six-year research period. She is currently an Assistant Professor at the Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED, Department of Didactics, School Organisation, and Special Didactics). Her most recent studies and publications focus on university entrance assessment in the Spanish context, the analysis of teacher training in Spain and the use of artificial intelligence in education. She is a member of the Medida y Evaluación de Sistemas Educativos (MESE) consolidated research group at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) and Innedu-UEM at the Universidad Europea de Madrid.

María Huetos-Domínguez, Universidad Europea

Bachelor’s Degree in Education Studies from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Her comprehensive academic background includes a Master’s Degree in Research in Applied Psychology from the Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM). She is currently studying towards a doctorate at the Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED). University teacher on the University Master’s programme in Educational Innovation. Her professional background is in education, with a focus on innovative educational experiences, the design of teaching materials and career guidance. She is also a member of the INNEDU-UEM Research Group. She has participated in projects on innovation and the enhancement of teaching quality, particularly those centred on university guidance. Her research interests include guidance and innovative teaching and learning spaces.

References

Al-Lal, M. F. (2021). Aula inteligente: definición y evolución. Didasc@ lia: Didáctica y Educación, 12(2), 96-118.

Araiza-Vázquez, M. J., Figueroa-Garza, F. G., y Pedraza-Sánchez, E. Y. (2023). Estimación del rendimiento de los estudiantes en una experiencia de aprendizaje móvil. Formación Universitaria, 16(1), 33-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062023000100033

Baque, P. G. C., y Marcillo, C. (2020). Estrategias pedagógicas innovadoras en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Dominio de las Ciencias, 6(3), 56-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.23857/dc.v6i3.1274

Bautista, G., Escofet, A., y López, M. (2019). Diseño y validación de un instrumento para medir las dimensiones ambiental, pedagógica y digital del aula. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 24(83), 1055-1075.

Benade, L. (2019). Flexible Learning Spaces: Inclusive by Design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00127-2

Bolliger, D. U., y Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845

Carvalho, L., y Yeoman, P. (2021). Performativity of materials in learning: The learning-whole in action. International Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.627

Cleveland, B., y Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. En J. Bellanca y R. Brandt (eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51-76). Solution Tree Press.

Desbrow, J. M., y Domínguez, S. C. (2020). El espacio como elemento facilitador del aprendizaje y de atención a la diversidad. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 13(25), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v13i25.2092

Díaz, L. A. (2022). El Aula del Futuro en la Europa del siglo XXI: de la teoría y la práctica, de lo digital y lo físico. En Pedagogía de las cosas: quiebras de la educación de hoy (pp. 287-293). Ediciones Octaedro.

Divyashree, M. (2018). Flipped Classroom-An Innovative Methodology for Effective Teaching Learning Process. Asian Journal of Management, 9(1), 451-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2321-5763.2018.00070.7

Düzenli, T., Alpak, E., Çiğdem, A., y Tarakçı Eren, E. (2018). The Effect of Studios on Learning in Design Education. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 191-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1392

Engel Rocamora, A., y Coll Salvador, C. (2022). Entornos híbridos de enseñanza y aprendizaje para promover la personalización del aprendizaje. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(1), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.1.31489

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., McEachen, J., Gardner, M., y Drummy, M. (2021). Sumergirse en el aprendizaje profundo: Herramientas atractivas. Ediciones Morata.

González-Zamar, M. D., y Abad-Segura, E. (2020). Diseño del espacio educativo universitario y su impacto en el proceso académico: análisis de tendencias. Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 13(25), 1-13.

Granito, V. J., y Santana, M. E. (2016). Psychology of Learning Spaces: Impact on Teaching and Learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(1), 1-8.

Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., y Freeman, A. (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. The New Media Consortium. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570463.pdf

Kellermeyer, L., Harnke, B., y Knight, S. (2018). Covidence and Rayyan. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 580.

Knezek, G., Christensen, R., y Furuta, T. (2019). Validation of a teacher educator technology competencies survey. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(4), 465-498.

Lave, J., y Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355.

Lozano-Díaz, A., Fernández-Prados, J. S., Figueredo Canosa, V., y Martínez Martínez, A. M. (2020). Impactos del confinamiento por el COVID-19 entre universitarios: Satisfacción Vital, Resiliencia y Capital Social Online. International Journal of Sociology of Education, Special Issue: COVID-19 Crisis and Socioeducative Inequalities and Strategies to Overcome them, 79-104.

Mahat, M., Bradbeer, C., Byers, T., e Imms, W. (2018). Innovative Learning Environments and Teacher Change: Defining key concepts. University of Melbourne, LEaRN. http://www.iletc.com.au/publications/reports

Navarro-González, I. (2023). La educación infantil en los países nórdicos: iniciativas innovadoras. IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH, 14, e1911. https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v14i0.1911

OECD (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., y Mulrow, C. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(71), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Parody, L. M., Leiva, J. J., y Santos-Villalba, M. (2022). El Diseño Universal para el aprendizaje en la Formación Digital del Profesorado desde una mirada pedagógica inclusiva. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 16(2), 109-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782022000200109

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press.

Radcliffe, D. (2008). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. En D. Radcliffe, H. Wilson, D. Powell y B. Tibbetts (eds.), Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design (pp. 9-16). The University of Queensland.

Rovai, A. P. (2018). Building a sense of community at a distance: What remains important in the digital age? Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.4000/dms.2685

Shevchenko, L., Makhynia, N., Polishchuk, G., Sotska, H., Koval, V., y Grygorenko, T. (2021). The Training of Future Teachers for Innovative Teaching Activities. Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/243

Tena, R., y Carrera, N. (2020). The Future Classroom Lab as a Framework of Development for Competency-and Project-based Learning. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 25(85), 449-468.

Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), 57-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03305643

Urrútia, G., y Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clínica, 135(11), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015

Vite, H. R. (2014). Ambientes de aprendizaje. Ciencia Huasteca Boletín Científico de la Escuela Superior de Huejutla, 2(4) 1-7. https://doi.org/10.29057/esh.v2i4.1069

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Weiss, A. (2019). Infraestructura educativa y su incidencia en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Revista Paraguaya de Educación, 8(1), 75-87.

Yang, J., Weiying, H. P., y Huang, R. (2018). Evaluation of smart classroom from the perspective of infusing technology into pedagogy. Smart Learning Environments, 58(20), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0070-1

Published

2025-10-06
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    22
  • PDF (Español)
    30
  • PDF
    30

How to Cite

Jiménez-García, E., Ruíz-Lázaro, J., and Huetos-Domínguez, M. (2025). Innovative learning spaces for the university of the future. Bibliometric review (2011-2024). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 83(292), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.9781/rep.2025.388

Issue

Section

Article