The formation of intelligence through Greco-Latin Literature and its survival.

Authors

  • Luis Arenal López Colegio Tajamar.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22550/REP79-1-2021-10

Keywords:

culture, literature, linguistics, Greek (classical), Latin

Abstract

Although the classical languages and literatures of Greece and Rome enjoy great prestige, they are increasingly neglected in mainstream curricula. This work aims to analyse the principal reasons behind this situation. To do so, it turns to the thoughts of different specialists who have considered the issue in depth. Their opinions cover a wide array of perspectives, but they all agree on one key point: the scant attention usually paid to texts in the teaching of Greco-Latin literature. Scholars have tended to focus on context, therefore obscuring the texts: they pay more attention to morphological, syntactic, historical, literary, and metric aspects than to the texts themselves. Means have thus become ends, with tangible and unfortunate consequences. As a solution to this, we propose returning the texts to the centre of the classroom, through reading — in full if possible — and discussion of the original works. This way, Greek and Latin language studies will achieve a greater relevance, precisely because they would allow a deeper and more direct knowledge of the classics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luis Arenal López, Colegio Tajamar.

Doctor of Latin Philology from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Head of Baccalaureate at the Colegio Tajamar, Madrid. Honorary Collaborator in the Department of Classical Philology of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1814-0883

References

Calvino, I. (1991). Perché leggere i classici [Por qué leer los clásicos]. Mondadori.

Cicero (1911). Orationes [Discursos] (vol. VI). Oxford Classical Texts.

De Romilly, J. (1992). Pourquoi la Grèce? [¿Por qué Grecia?]. Editions de Fallois.

Díaz y Díaz, M. C. (2006). El filólogo clásico ante el Latín Medieval: nuevos compromisos y responsabilidades. En A. A. Nascimento y P. F. Alberto (Eds.), Actas do IV Congresso Internacional de Latim Medieval Hispânico (Lisboa, 12-15 de Outubro de 2005) (pp. 91-98). Centro de Estudos Clássicos, Faculdade de Letras de Lisboa.

Fontán, A. (2001). Letras y poder en Roma. Eunsa.

García Gual, G. (2017). La luz de los lejanos faros. Una defensa apasionada de las humanidades. Ariel.

Gardini, N. (2017). ¡Viva el latín! Historias y belleza de una lengua inútil. Crítica.

Jiménez Lozano, J. (2003). Los cuadernos de letra pequeña. Pre-textos.

Lewis, C. S. (1993). Cartas del diablo a su sobrino (las cartas de Escrutopo). Rialp.

Martialis (2007). Epigrammata [Epigramas]. Oxford Classical Texts.

Mut i Arbós, J. (2017). En torno a la didáctica de las lenguas clásicas: qué, cómo y para qué. Estudios Clásicos, 151, 157-177.

Ordine, N. (2013). La utilidad de lo inútil. Manifiesto. Acantilado.

Valera, J. (1907). Obras completas (vol. XII). Imprenta alemana.

Published

2021-01-01
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    46
  • PDF (Español)
    19
  • PDF
    19

How to Cite

Arenal López, L. (2021). The formation of intelligence through Greco-Latin Literature and its survival. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 79(278), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP79-1-2021-10

Issue

Section

Studies

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.