Qualitative analysis of the professional profile of a good secondary school teacher.

Authors

  • Esther López Martín Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
  • Belén Gutiérrez de Rozas Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
  • Andrea Otero Mayer Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
  • Eva Expósito Casas Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22550/REP80-3-2022-04

Keywords:

teacher skills, teacher evaluation, focus groups, qualitative research, teacher effectiveness

Abstract

Scientific literature has shown that teacher characteristics and skills are one of the main sources of variation in students’ academic performance. This potential that teachers have in improving the quality of the education system justifies the importance of identifying the teacher-related factors that are positively related to student learning. This study aims to contribute to this purpose by analysing the professional profile of a good secondary school teacher from the perspective of students, members of school management teams, and the teachers themselves. For this purpose, a qualitative research design was established based on an analysis of the views of the participants. Five focus groups were conducted with the participation of five members of school management teams, nine teachers and nine students. Through both the a priori and inductive coding of the content of these focus groups, the professional profile of a good teacher was identified. This profile was made up of three teaching skills and seven personal skills, specified in 79 actions. The integration of all the participants’ perspectives enabled the creation of a comprehensive proposal of an effective teacher by capturing the nuances provided by each individual perspective. Based on this, new research and actions can be designed that contribute to improving the quality of initial and in-service training for secondary school teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Esther López Martín, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.

has a PhD in Education Science from Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM). Since 2019, she has worked as an associate professor at the Department of Research and Diagnostic Methods in Education II at Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED). Her main lines of research focus on the evaluation of students’ academic performance and the associated factors, with a special focus on the characteristics and skills of teachers. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0367-2019

Belén Gutiérrez de Rozas, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.

holds a degree in Pedagogy (special prize) from UNED and a Master’s in Educational Psychology (academic excellence grant) from UCM. She is currently a trainee researcher at the Department of Research and Diagnostic Methods in Education II at UNED. Her research focuses on the study of failing to achieve the minimum level of academic qualification and early school leaving. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-3270

Andrea Otero Mayer, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.

holds a degree in Social Education from UNED, for which she was awarded a special degree prize. In February 2019, she joined the Department of Research and Diagnostic Methods in Education II at UNED, after being awarded pre-doctoral financial support for research training. She carried out two research periods at Universidade do Porto in 2021 and 2022, and she was awarded a PhD with a distinction cum laude, continuing her work under a post-doctoral contract. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6093-6543

Eva Expósito Casas, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.

holds a PhD in Education from UCM. She is currently an associate professor at the Department of Research and Diagnostic Methods in Education II at UNED. She is a member of the UCM MESE research group, which researches the measurement and evaluation of education systems, and the GRISOP research group, which researches educational and career guidance systems and the skills of guidance professionals. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7943-3228

References

Alonso-Sainz, T. (2021). ¿Qué caracteriza a un «buen docente»? Percepciones de sus protagonistas. Profesorado, Revista De Currículum Y Formación Del Profesorado, 25 (2), 165-191. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v25i2.18445

Bisquerra, R. y Pérez, N. (2007). Las competencias emocionales. Educación XX1, 10, 61-82. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.1.10.297

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J. y Neville, A. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research [El uso de la triangulación en la investigación cualitativa]. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41 (5), 545-547.

Creswell, J. W. y Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches [Indagación cualitativa y diseño de la investigación: elegir entre cinco enfoques]. Sage Publications.

Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. https://bibliotecadigital.mineduc.cl/handle/20.500.12365/17302

García-García, M., Biencinto, C., Carpintero, E., Villamor, P., Camilli, C., Pastor, L., Serrano, S., Huetos, M., Núñez, C., Arias, J., Bravo, J. L, Caravantes, A., del Mazo, J. C., Martínez, S., Sánchez, J. A. , González, D., Arias, J. M., Pérez, H., Burguera, J., … y Ramos, G. (28-30 de junio de 2017). Evaluación de competencias docentes para la inclusión y la excelencia: resultados preliminares sobre la percepción del profesorado. XVIII Congreso Internacional de Investigación Educativa: Interdisciplinariedad y Transferencia AIDIPE, Salamanca, España. https://aidipe2017.aidipe.org/files/2017/07/ACTAS_AIDIPE_2017.pdf

Gutiérrez-de-Rozas, B., López-Martín, E. y Carpintero Molina, E. (en prensa). Condicionantes del rendimiento académico: meta-síntesis de 25 años de meta-análisis. Revista de Educación, 398.

Hanushek, E. A. y Woessmann L. (2017). School resources and student achievement: A review of cross-country economic research. En M. Rosén, K. Y. Hansen y U. Wolff (Eds), Cognitive Abilities and Educational Outcomes. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment (pp. 149-171). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43473-5_8

Hattie, J. (octubre, 2003). Teachers make a difference, what is the research evidence? [Los profesores marcan la diferencia, ¿cuál es la evidencia de la investigación?] [Presentación de artículo]. Building teacher quality: What does the research tell us. ACER Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia. https://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement [El aprendizaje visible: una síntesis de más de 800 meta-análisis relacionados con el rendimiento]. Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning plus. 250+ influences on student achievement [Aprendizaje visible plus. Más de 250 influencias en el rendimiento de los alumnus]. https://visible-learning.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/250-InfluencesFinal-Effect-Size-List-2017_VLPLUS.pdf

Iglesias-Díaz, P. y Romero-Pérez, C. (2021). Aulas afectivas e inclusivas y bienestar adolescente: una revisión sistemática. Educación XX1, 24 (2), 305-350. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.28705

Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD [El arte y la ciencia de la enseñanza: un marco global para una instrucción eficaz]. ASCD.

Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2022). Documento para debate. 24 propuestas de reforma para la mejora de la profesión docente. https://educagob.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:adf4f050-9832-4a88-9cd2-96cd3519c664/documento-de-debate-24-propuestas-de-reforma-profesi-n-docente.pdf

Muijs, D. y Reynolds, D. (2017). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice [Enseñanza eficaz: evidencia y práctica]. Sage.

Opdenakker, M. C. y Van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice [Las características del profesor y los estilos de enseñanza como factores de mejora de la eficacia de la práctica en el aula]. Teaching and teacher education, 22 (1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.008

Reoyo, N., Carbonero, M. Á. y Martín, L. J. (2017). Características de eficacia docente desde las perspectivas del profesorado y futuro profesorado de secundaria. Revista de Educación, 376, 62-86. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-376-344

Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L. y Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis [La asociación entre el liderazgo de los profesores y el rendimiento de los alumnos: Un meta-análisis]. Educational Research Review, 100357, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357

Smith, E. y Gorard, S. (2007). Improving teacher quality: Lessons from America’s No child left behind [Mejorar la calidad del profesorado: lecciones de la iniciativa No child left behind de Estados Unidos]. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37 (2), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640701372426

Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers [Cualidades de los profesores eficaces]. ASCD.

Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J. y Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement [¿Qué hace que los buenos profesores sean buenos? Un análisis cruzado de la conexión entre la eficacia del profesorado y el rendimiento de los alumnus]. Journal of teacher Education, 62 (4), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111404241

Tapani, A. y Salonen, A. O. (2019). Identifying teachers’ competencies in Finnish vocational education [Identificación de las competencias de los profesores en la formación profesional finlandesa]. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6 (3), 243- 260. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.3.3

UNICEF (2015). Cuaderno de integración curricular de Educación en Derechos. https://www.unicef.es/educa/biblioteca/guia-integracion-curricular-educacion-derechos-infancia

Villaverde-Caramés, E. J., Fernández-Villarino, M. Á., Toja-Reboredo, B. y González-Valeiro, M. Á. (2021). Revisión de la literatura sobre las características que definen a un buen docente de Educación Física: consideraciones desde la formación del profesorado. Retos, 41, 471-479. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.84421

Walsh, K. (2001). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality [La certificación del profesorado reconsiderada: tropezando con la calidad]. The Abell Foundation.

Williams, R. E. (2010). Administrator and teacher perceptions of the qualities of effective teachers [Percepciones de los administradores y los profesores sobre las cualidades de los profesores eficaces]. The College of William and Mary.

The Wing Institute (2019). Teacher Competencies. https://www.winginstitute.org/quality-teachers-compentencies

Published

2022-09-01
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    69
  • PDF (Español)
    33
  • PDF
    33

How to Cite

López Martín, E., Gutiérrez de Rozas, B., Otero Mayer, A., and Expósito Casas, E. (2022). Qualitative analysis of the professional profile of a good secondary school teacher. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 80(283), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP80-3-2022-04

Issue

Section

Notas

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.