Analysis of content and underlying theories in Spanish reference texts on General Didactics.

Authors

  • María Cristina Moral Santaella Universidad de Granada.
  • Agustín de la Herrán Gascón Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22550/REP79-3-2021-01

Keywords:

General Didactics, reference work, teacher training, competence, teaching profession

Abstract

The results of the 2019 Pisa Reports confirm that the Spanish education system continues to stagnate after compulsory education has been completed. This situation calls for self-criticism on the part of all actors involved. One of the groups concerned are the university professors and lecturers who provide training for prospective teachers. Among them are those who teach General Didactics. They provide basic and multi-purpose training on teaching methods for prospective teachers. For this purpose, they usually consider traditional and recent textbooks and other reference texts on teaching theory and practice, which help to define the discipline. The aim of the study is to find out whether these works train and equip prospective teachers with teaching competences and to verify their educational and professional potential with regard to the teaching theory they convey. In order to fulfil this aim, a descriptive documentary study of 35 reference works on General Didactics was carried out, including both textbooks and texts used as sources of didactic knowledge. The content of the structure and composition of these texts was analysed. The results show a tendency to prioritise theoretical aspects over competences and to order chapters based on a technical and administrative tradition, rather than a conceptual and semantic approach focused on designing a meaningful learning experience. As an applied summary, recommendations are provided for the development of textbooks on General Didactics, aimed at initial teacher training, from a more competence-based and less academic approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

María Cristina Moral Santaella, Universidad de Granada.

works as Associate Professor at the Universidad de Granada. She trains early years, primary and secondary school teachers, and conducts research into different areas of study for educational improvement and change. She is a member of the FORCE Research Group and of the RILME Network, among others. Her research interests are teacher training didactics and curriculum, educational leadership, qualitative research. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-165X

Agustín de la Herrán Gascón, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

works as Associate Professor in the Department of Pedagogy of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. His research interests are teacher training, pedagogy of creativity, history of educational innovation, complexity and awareness in education or radical and inclusive approach to education, among others. He is a member of the research group PR-005 “Social and labour inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities”. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-6971

References

Anderson, L. W. y Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing [Una taxonomía para aprender, enseñar y evaluar]. Longman.

Bolívar, A. (2005). Conocimiento didáctico del contenido y didácticas específicas. Profesorado, 9 (2), 1-39.

Bolívar, A. (2008). Didáctica y currículum: de la modernidad a la postmodernidad. Aljibe.

Bolívar, A. y Pérez, P. (2019). Políticas educativas sobre el profesorado. En A. de la Herrán, J. M. Valle y J. L. Villena (Coords.), ¿Qué estamos haciendo mal en la educación? (pp. 25-35). Octaedro.

Consejo Escolar del Estado (2015). El profesorado del siglo XXI. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.

Council of the European Union (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning [Recomendación del Consejo, de 22 de mayo de 2018, sobre las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&rid=7

Darling-Hammond, L. y Oakes, J. (2019). Preparing teachers for a deeper learning [Preparando profesores para un aprendizaje más profundo]. HEP.

Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum [El niño y el currículum]. Chicago-Press.

Egido, I. y López, E. (2016). Condicionantes de la conexión entre teoría y práctica en el Prácticum de Magisterio. Estudios sobre Educación, 30, 217- 237. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.30.217-237

European Commission (2004). Implementation of «Education and Training 2010» Work Programme. Key Competencesfor Lifelong Learning. A European Reference Framework [Aplicación del programa de trabajo «Educación y Formación 2010». Competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Un marco de referencia europeo]. https://step4-sfc.eu/IMG/pdf/201509_a_integrer_dans_le_site_basicframe.pdf

Gairín Sallán, J., Díaz-Vicario A., del Arco Bravo, I. y Flores i Alarcia, O. (2019). Efecto e impacto de las prácticas curriculares de los Grados de Educación Infantil y Primaria. Educación XX1, 22 (2), 17-43. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.21311

González-Sanmamed, M. (2009). Una nueva oportunidad para la formación inicial del profesorado de Educación Secundaria. Revista de Educación, 350, 57-78.

González-Sanmamed, M. y Fuentes, E. (2011). El prácticum en el aprendizaje de la profesión docente. Revista de Educación, 354, 47-70.

Hall, R. (2020). Mixing methods in social research. Quantiative, qualitative and combine methods [Mezcla de métodos en la investigación social. Métodos cuantitativos, cualitativos y combinados]. Sage.

Hattie, J. y Clarke, S. (2019). Visible learning feedback [Retroalimentación del aprendizaje visible]. Routledge.

Heredia, A. (2015). Los manuales de Didáctica en español entre 1900-1970. revista española de pedagogía, 73 (260), 121-139. https://revistadepedagogia.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/260-07.pdf

McTighe, J. y Willis, J. (2019). Understanding by design meets neuroscience [La comprensión a través del diseño se une a la neurociencia]. ASCD.

Novak, J. (2010). Learning, creating and using knowledge [Aprender, crear y utilizar el conocimiento]. Routledge.

Ritchart, R. y Church, M. (2020). Making thinking visible [Visibilizar el pensamiento]. Jossey Bass.

Schwab, J. (1970). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum [La práctica 3: traducción al currículo]. School Review, 81 (4), 501-522.

Shulman, L. (2005). Conocimiento y enseñanza. Fundamentos para una nueva reforma. Profesorado, 9 (2), 1-28.

Sousa, D. (2017). How the brain learn [Cómo aprende el cerebro]. Corwin.

Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction [Principios básicos del currículo y la instrucción]. Chicago-Press.

Walter, D. y Soltis, F. (2004). Curriculum and aims [Currículum y objetivos]. College-Press.

Weinstein, Y. y Sumeracki, M. (2019). Understanding how we learn [Entender cómo aprendemos]. Routledge.

Published

2021-09-01
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    51
  • PDF (Español)
    20
  • PDF
    20

How to Cite

Moral Santaella, M. C. and de la Herrán Gascón, A. (2021). Analysis of content and underlying theories in Spanish reference texts on General Didactics. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 79(280). https://doi.org/10.22550/REP79-3-2021-01

Issue

Section

Studies

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.